The USPTO Shortens Some Office Action Response Deadlines To Three Months – Trademark

To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login to Mondaq.com.

As part of the Trademark Modernization Act discussed in our December 2021 Trademark Alert, the US Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) will reduce the time to respond to a pending application Office Action from six months to three monthsbeginning on December 3, 2022.

This new reduced timeline applies only to Office Actions issued
on or after December 3, 2022. However, the new time frame will NOT apply to Section 66a Applications (those based on International Registrations) and will not immediately apply to post-registration Office Actions. Instead, a three-month response period for post-registration Office Actions will begin next year, on October 7, 2023.

The initial deadline is extendable one time for an additional three months (for a total of six months from the issuance of the Office Action). There is a government filing fee of $125 for the extension.

If you miss the deadline to respond to the Office Action and do not file the extension, the application will become abandoned. However, it still may be possible to file a petition to revive if certain requirements are met.

What does this mean?

The law should enable the USPTO to address simple issues more quickly, thus expediting the application process. However, you should pay close attention to reported response deadlines since they may be sooner than you were used to previously.

Also, because some Office Actions are complex and may require more response time, you should be prepared for the possibility of incurring a $125 government filing fee to extend the initial deadline.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Intellectual Property from United States

Yes, You Need An NFT Artist Contract!

Klein Moynihan Turco LLP

In the relatively new frontier of non-fungible tokens, or “NFTs,” carefully drafted contracts with artists are essential to protecting any NFT collection.

Using AI Artwork To Avoid Copyright Infringement

Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger

AI-generated art isn’t perfect, but it’s become a viable option for license-free set decoration in motion pictures and other commercial productions. Here’s what you need to know.

.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button